Re: Violent internet porn to be banned
- From: George Woodbine <george@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:23:47 +0100
zippy wrote:
Oh dear. This is going to be a major headache. How do you define
Violent and abusive? Is it going to be left to juries again? Does it
mean putting even more people on the SOR? Does it apply to violent and
abusive images against men? (Which a lot of BDSM porn is) Is it just
another reason to arrest another 50,000 'perverts'? Does one thumbnail
of a person tied up become illegal?
You see? Already too many problems with this. It is ill advised and kneejerk.
You make far too much sense.
The start of a slippery slope indeed, what will the next interest group want banning?
It'll be worth it though when the Internet grows up to be one giant AOL. .
- References:
- Violent internet porn to be banned
- From: zippy
- Violent internet porn to be banned
- Prev by Date: Re: Cheshire Police get it right: Youth 'brandished gun in street'
- Next by Date: Re: Cheshire Police get it right: Youth 'brandished gun in street'
- Previous by thread: Re: Violent internet porn to be banned
- Next by thread: Re: Violent internet porn to be banned
- Index(es):