Re: Bloody phishing emails!
- From: Mike Scott <usenet.9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 12:34:19 GMT
Johannes wrote:
....
Mike Scott wrote:
No, the answer is education, I think. Not coercion, or yet more costs.
But education only speaks to the converted. The answer is that every email should be traceable; there can be no genuine reason to send anonymous
That would be very useful. Technically, I think there's no particular problem, beyond getting everyone to agree on a standard (and spf isn't the answer!). But quite how you get every ISP and his dog to implement new standards is the M£64 question.
emails. It would also at the same time discourage spamming and virus emails. This may require technical changes. It could be introduced such that if the trace is lost at some point, then the email is automatically dumped.
Hmm. We'd have to agree to differ there - I'm not sure dumping purely because a traceback is lost is such a good idea. But for now it's academic anyway.....
-- Please use the corrected version of the address below for replies. Replies to the header address will be junked, as will mail from various domains listed at www.scottsonline.org.uk Mike Scott Harlow Essex England.(unet -a-t- scottsonline.org.uk) .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bloody phishing emails!
- From: Johannes
- Re: Bloody phishing emails!
- References:
- Bloody phishing emails!
- From: Random Observer
- Re: Bloody phishing emails!
- From: Colin Wilson
- Re: Bloody phishing emails!
- From: Mike Harrison
- Re: Bloody phishing emails!
- From: Joe Soap
- Re: Bloody phishing emails!
- From: Mike Scott
- Re: Bloody phishing emails!
- From: Johannes
- Bloody phishing emails!
- Prev by Date: Re: Employment reference
- Next by Date: Re: Employment reference
- Previous by thread: Re: Bloody phishing emails!
- Next by thread: Re: Bloody phishing emails!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|