Re: MARGARET EDWARDS

In article <1145349796.831308.105140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
cambridge till I die <l.plumridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mabon, just listen to Margaret and listen to me, NO ONE HAS SENT
ME HERE! I am an individual and no one is telling this. I wanted
to see if the public perception of you was right after my letter,
and I found this blog by simply typing your name into Google.

Ah! A penny has dropped.

I wondered why this stuff was continuing to appear here. Of course:
users of rubbish like Google Groups often seem to this this is a
"blog" or a "website", which of course it is not. It is a
*newsgroup*. No wonder they don't post properly...

The initial statements by the two main protagonists on this whole
issue were useful, but it does seem a bit daft continuing this
debate here, when it is clearly intended for a different medium (the
style of posting shows this, as well as the subject matter).

Just as a suggestion, might it therefore be wise to take this
concersation to a more suitable place? You can always post a link
here for those who might wish to follow the unfolding story.

--
John M Ward - see http://www.horsted.john-ward.org.uk
Conservative Councillor for Rochester South & Horsted ward, Medway
* Oppose electoral fraud, especially through postal votes
* Scrap the ODPM, SEERA, and the Standards Board for England
* Return all local decisions to local people
.