Re: If the CSA want to fight... I'm Ready! Was: Re: Interview Under Caution]

Great result - don't let these morons intimidate with their
scatter-gun, computer-generated bull***. They have no style,
no class, and absolutely no intelligence. They are a very
blunt instrument manned by the intellectual scrapings off the bottom
of the barrel, and I have absolutely zero respect for them or their
crude, malicious ways. And certainly no respect for their political masters.

You stood your ground, you out-fought and out-smarted them -
revealing them for the morons they are, and the feebleness of
their system. I salute you for that.



Fletcher wrote:
Cool dude, you did good.

Could this be a new begining for the Gestapo?


"Should I be Concerned?" <ready@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:gju6v3t44m4c7jsivl4coe16ratrhusfgs@xxxxxxxxxx
Just an update...

As you may (or may not) recall, I was called a criminal, I was called
a liar, I was called a fraud, I was told that I *must* be interviewed
under caution (I declined to accept the invitation) and I was summoned
to court by the CSA (I didn't go).

After my failure to appear at court for failure to 'provide the
requested information' I drafted and dispatched a scathingly sarcastic
letter to the CSA 'investigator' (I use the term in its loosest
sense). I suggested that they just go away and do their job and pursue
appropriate cases and not harass innocent individuals. I gave them no
real information other than the fact that they should actually
investigate instead of harassing. I gave them a valuable clue that the
information they required could be obtained by themselves from the DWP
and the IR and requested that they follow their nose in this
direction.

Guess what? Today I received a letter thanking me for my
correspondence and politely requesting a little additional information
that they have been unable to verify for themselves (after actually
being forced into doing their job as opposed to simply slinging mud).
Furthermore they informed me that they will not now be pursuing *any*
action against me in light of the information I have given them*.

*I did not actually give them any information, I just requested that
they do what they are employed to do and stop acting the goat.

I suppose that's as close as one can get to an apology from the CSA?!

A result... For now at least.





.