Re: Backdating payments?
- From: "Mick Beeby" <no_spam.mick.beeby@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:25:41 -0000
"Claire Rand" <claire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:TqOdnUM3eYvRZFvaRVnyvQA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mr X wrote:Never mind what they tell you on the phone. Write a letter with all the
"Claire Rand" <claire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1sudnVqbhcIztyLanZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Lee Phillips wrote:
Claire Rand wrote:well they *were* told about the redendency, its just taken them nearly a
NRP is my better half, its his ex thats the issue.It sounds like the letter you've got is just the assessment
he was made redundent, told the clowns of this in march 2007, a DOE
naturally stopped at the time. its taken them till now to send
anything through, we have had two letters one for time spent on
benefits, a fiver a week apparently and another one for the current
job, which started months ago. its just taken them till now to inform
us of anything.
the letters don't mention back dating, but they don't say they won't
either, there is no arreas amount indicated though.
we're not planning on phoning them yet, the letters don't ask him to
do anything, apparently there is another letter on its way about how
to pay.
notification. As you've seen on your later message, the payment one
arrives soon after.
btw these morons accept standing order payments? no way we're lettingThey do take standing orders but again as you've found out, once a DEO
them have a DD.
existed, you don't get a chance to lose it.
btw his ex used to keep hammering on about my income, we're notMarried or just living together makes no difference.
married (yet) does this matter in the slightest?
btw i currently do vountary work, so not paid.
If he's on the new-rules system, you won't even be included in the
assessment.
If he's on old-rules it gets a bit complicated.....
If you're on a low/zero income it 'may' reduce the amount payable.
However, there's lots of other variables that mean it'll make no
difference.
If you're on a high income, the chances are your presence will not
affect the payable amount in any way. However, in theory, it may count
against him if he's on a fairly low income himself.
I would assume that given they were told of the changes, but its takenAlthough it's not fair - the problem is that when the redundancy was
till now to inform us of anything its a bit rich to decide they want
to back date things.
but i guess they will probably try it.
notified and payments stopped, it didn't mean that the case
automaticaly stopped charging.
Basically all this time it's been charging whatever the original
assessment was.
What the CSA have just done is replace those charges (since 2006) with
£5 a week while he was on benefit and £xx.xx from when the job started.
They could argue that if they didn't backdate, you'd have an even
bigger arrears balance.
year to write back, the payments stopped, and the arrears amount doesn't
match up from them keeping building it up.. but who knows
he wasn't on benefits all that long, only a few months which may have
caused other problems.
If they didn't send out any 'missed payment' reminders during all thishes written, they were contacted and told, though at first they tried to
time, I reckon it's worth writing in to complain. However, if you did
get some you may have a problem (they'll then turn it around to be your
fault for not contacting them about it).
claim that apparently its a legal requirement when you leave a job to
register for benefits.. which he did after a few weeks to allow
something of a hoilday.. this may have caused some of the confusion
i'm thinking of only dealing with the clowns in writing, last timeGood idea :)
they had a habit of forgetting bits of conversations they didn't like
Just a note to mention on the CSA charter, I believe, the csa cannot
claim further back than 6 months if it is an administrative error on
their part...
which it is...
this maybe the case, but somehow prior dealings with them inform him that
there is little point pressing this.
currently hes gone for 'radio silence' they are doing a DoE and haven't
sent anything through asking or demanding information. not sure exactly
where they got the salary details etc from but there seems no point
fighting it.
the 8am-8pm phone number rings, is answered by a robot, which then hangs
up.
evidence and you WILL get anything except the last 6 months arrears
suspended.
I did this on my original assessment (back in 2000) where they took 15
months to deal with everything.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Backdating payments?
- From: Claire Rand
- Re: Backdating payments?
- Prev by Date: CSA rears it's head again after 6 years!
- Next by Date: Re: Moving House & Change of Circumstances
- Previous by thread: CSA rears it's head again after 6 years!
- Next by thread: Re: Backdating payments?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
