Re: End of liability?

Yeh I think your correct in that asssumption but if the PWC lies on the
forms she's committing an offence,
Oh and the bastards at CSA acctually prosecute MEN for doing exactly that
but never womewn, strange that init.
The rotten cow probably thinks she needs to justify this dirty trick so why
not just throw in a few complete lies.

re spam, nothing we can do, thats the wonders of usenet

<le_freak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1194283318.729738.155010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm a bit confused by this post.

I always thought it was a simple matter for the PWC
to transfer from CScumA1 to CScumA2.

According to my limited understanding, the PWC
closes the existing case - without any justification,
waits 13 of their weeks, then opens a new case
against the NRP.

Voila! Case transferred to the new scheme.

If so, I'm wondering why the PWC is going through
all these idiotic contortions by lying and stuff.
Ie. I assumed, as always, Her Maj's Govt of fools
empower the CScumA to give all the power to the
PWC, who in turn can use the CScumA as a stick to
try and beat and humiliate us (as if losing your kids
wasn't bad enough).

Or am I missing something crucial?

Le Freak

ps do Google respond to the carpet bombing
this group is getting by spammers? How do we
clear this crap out?




.