Re: CSA breaking the law! (continued)

Oh posted before I'd made my main point!

In such a case the defamed persons lawyer would demand they remove that name
from the site and they would have to do it. So were then back to the CSA
favourite game discrimination as legally they would then only be able to
post the names of people who were uniquely named in any town, even then some
one could move into that town and again take them back to court.

Just can't wait until we see the first case of this hit the courts.


"Fletcher" <fletcherhere@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7L6dnYlqO5TZ2BvbnZ2dnUVZ8qugnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Not only that but they are defaming any other person by that name living
in that town.

That should certainly be a reason to take them to task and seek
substantial damages, we are trying to find such people and may consider
local adverts to bring this to the attention of such people.

In such a case the CSA don't have a leg to stand on as they neither list
address nor date of birth, place of employment or any other details.

A person wronged and maligned in this way might retire on the settlement a
good Barrister might squeeze out of them in a courtroom.

And I'm sure such a case would make great headlines in the press.


"gaz" <gary.morris350@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1183156831.485560.245380@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 29 Jun, 23:29, csad...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 29 Jun, 22:53, gaz <gary.morris...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The CSA 'Name and Shame' policy is breaking both European Human Rights
laws and domestic law. Under the Defamation Act 1996, Godfrey -v-
Demon Internet Ltd held that somebody can sue if they have -
wrongfully or not - been publicly named for a non payment.

They are not named for non payent but for failing to give correct
information. The issue is women fail to disclose accurate information
but CSA do not take them to court

I stand corrected. But regardless of this, name and shame still
constitutes a defemation of character, whether it be for non-payment
or faliure to disclose information. The principle remains the same, so
they are still breaking the law under the Defamation Act.





.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: No justice in uk courts!
    ... judges kowtowing to Ministers, court official lying, and of course the usual ... CSA lies. ... his hands firmly tied behind his back and you have no recourse to law. ... The first rule of the court is the integrity of the Judge, ...
    (uk.gov.agency.csa)
  • Re: CSA breaking the law!
    ... In such a case the CSA don't have a leg to stand on as they neither list ... The issue is women fail to disclose accurate information ... they are still breaking the law under the Defamation Act. ...
    (uk.gov.agency.csa)
  • Say, Larry, How About This Bizarre Legal Argument? (Effective Assistance of Counsel, Sixth Amendment
    ... Defendant asks the Court to take Judicial Notice of the fact that many ... the Constitution were attorneys, such as John Jay, first Chief ... To have a "friend" act as Counsel was a Common Law Right and was ...
    (misc.legal)
  • Re: Q & A about the IRS
    ... General Counsel in the U.S. Department of the Treasury to be the Chief IRS could be ... Constitution guarantees the Rule of Law to all Americans (we are to be ... inside the 50 States by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of U.S. v. ...
    (misc.taxes)
  • TURMEL: S. David Frankel, Q.C.s (Queens Counsel) signature
    ... Court Order decision to counter the legality of cannabis. ... Order stating cannabis cultivation is legal is now the law ... set aside/void Court Orders from other parts of Canada ...
    (sci.econ)