Re: CSA and court orders

Many thanks for this.


"Toffee" <si_w_0001@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ybHrh.65087$z01.21371@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A copy of the court order will need to be sent in anyway. Ensure that the
case officer sends a copy to their adjudication team for a decision on
whether it can be overruled rather than makes a decision themselves.

"NACSA CHAIR" <chairperson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:R%crh.32083$k74.437@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
if the court order was dated 2000, there was no reason why CSA didnt have
jurisdiction. Under CS2, no application can be granted if a court is in
place that is less than 12 months old. in your case this doesnt apply -
so no reason why CSA couldnt continue with the application - unless the
order is written under one of the statutes that prevent her from
applying...in which case, that will be the case unless she goes onto
benefit
NACSA CHAIR

--
WHEN CSA GET IT WRONG...NACSA PUT IT RIGHT!!! www.nacsa.co.uk PO BOX
4454, Dudley West Midlands, DY1 9AN FAX 01384 343966
Disclaimer: the content of this email is based upon information supplied
and
is subject to errors and omissions
"Fred" <Fred@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45ad1349$0$32022$fa0fcedb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Many thanks.

When did that change?

She tried that in around 2003 and the CSA got it all wrong. Because
there was a Court Order in place after their divorce they couldn't
intervene. In the end they offered her £50 as compensation for the
incorrect information they gave her!


"NACSA CHAIR" <chairperson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:y01rh.31701$k74.10429@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
as the court order is not tied to the CS2 conditions, being pre 2003
there is nothing to stop her applying to the CSA. However, some court
orders do prevent any application to the CSA, depends on what statutes
the order was made under.

NACSA CHAIR

--
WHEN CSA GET IT WRONG...NACSA PUT IT RIGHT!!! www.nacsa.co.uk PO BOX
4454, Dudley West Midlands, DY1 9AN FAX 01384 343966
Disclaimer: the content of this email is based upon information
supplied and
is subject to errors and omissions
"Fred" <Fred@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45ac2689$0$31238$da0feed9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have a friend who is receiving £150 per month for one child. This is
from
a Court Order dated 2000. His net income is now in the order of
£2,000 per
month.

She's sufficiently timid not to pursue him in the courts despite
having
crippling financial difficulties. She might get legal aid but given
what
the rules are now like I'm not sure.

Am I correct in saying that the CSA will not pursue any claim unless
she
goes on Income support?

Can anyone suggest a way forward for her?













.