Re: its well wrong

Yeh Everybody

Work this point to death it's the very piont of the blade that might pierce
this particular Gestapo idiocy bubble! and its a prime example of just how
useless this system is.

Lets ask questions like how much it costs in admin cost just to run this
crazy system that runs in the name of children then denies the very children
in whos name its claimed any benefit at all?

Might be worth reposting this in its own thread to ensure everyone sees it.



"NACSA CHAIR" <chairperson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:NYFDf.12452$wl.4375@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> NACSA did raise this as an official complaint to all levels - but they are
> reluctant to give any response other than "its the same as we did when it
> was working family tax credit". But this is not right....we accept that
> WORKING tax credit "could" be argued as income....but no CHILD tax
credits -
> this is for your children, not the children in another household, who
> receive child tax credits in their own right.
>
> I think i may reinstate the complaint, particularly back to the IR
> solicitors who were interested when we first raised the point. It might
> also be a help if people like yourselves who suffer under this rule
perhaps
> write to your MP making sure that you have him/her ask a question in the
> House of Commons regarding this practise. If you can copy it to NACSA we
> will then include it with the complaint to IR solicitors. Either send
your
> letter by post to us at NACSA P O BOX 4454, Dudley, West Midlands, DY1
> 9AN....or email it to me.
>
> NACSA CHAIR
> "Fletcher" <fletcherhere@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:j_uDf.12158$wl.3024@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Because the incompetent imbeciles that designed this utter mess didn't
> > understand enough about it before committing it into law!
> >
> > Its that simple, the whole thing is an ugly mess that fails everyone on
> > every count. It discriminate in many ways yours is just another ideal
> > example.
> >
> > So what can you do? Other than pester your MP there is nothing you can
do
> > unless you become unemployed, self-employed or you emigrate.
> >
> > But certainly don't expect things to change and they'll never be fair.
> > This
> > is the Gestapo's Britain!
> >
> >
> > "JAMES DONALDSON" <jsd34@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:gCuDf.219163$vl2.66917@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> why dose my new kid have to pay for my past?
> >>
> >>
> >> "Ripped Off" <xxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:2WtDf.18797$mf2.12197@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Your damn right it is. The other family will also be receiving tax
> > credits
> >> > which when awarded (although based on income) ignores the amount of
> > money
> >> > you pay each week. The government don't like NRP's having a life and
> > must
> >> > make your second family suffer to make the first happy. The tax
credits
> >> > are for your new family but you must share them with the mothers who
> >> > already receive them in their own right. Yeah, it's well wrong!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "JAMES DONALDSON" <jsd34@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> > news:vOrDf.219044$vl2.149116@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> the gov says my wage is to low to support my wife and child
> >> >> so the give me £60 a week in tax credits
> >> >>
> >> >> the csa take £60 a week of my wage for my 3 other children
> >> >>
> >> >> how is it that I have to receive benefits to cope yet the csa says
my
> >> >> wage is to high
> >> >> so they take £60 a week
> >> >>
> >> >> some thing is far wrong......
> >> >>
> >> >> whats the point in giving me tax credits just for the csa to take it
> > back
> >> >> off me?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>


.