Re: shafted again

csanightmare wrote:
> hi all
>
> been in court today for second time fist time evidence was incorrect
> so new court date today#
>
> been again and could not belive proceedure
> they were pursuing a liability order which i could prove was
> incorrect even the magestrates of which there was 3 on the case
> agreed it was incorrect the scum were pushing the case as it would be
> 6 years in jan and they couldnt persue it afer then
>
> the csa rep was ok but the csa legal adviser was a right lessi man
> hater she told the magastrate the law was that if one payment had
> been missed then they can order the liability order even though the amount
> is incorrect and that debt stands.,..........
>
> the magistrate said she felt uncomfortable making the order but it was
> out of her hands
>
> my advise is dont bother wasting money on solicitors because the
> outcome is written in stone the proceedure is completely bent as is
> all the justice system in this country
>
> the system thet lets kids decide when they live with their mother when
> challanged in court would they like to visit dad what a joke as if
> they are going to take the wrath of the bitch
>
> well sorry about ranting but just about had enough
>
> ps rang csa today and asked for full breakdown in payments was told 3
> months at the earlyist i told the advisor that the csa standards didnt
> show 3 months for a breakdown
>
> i also advised her that i was taping the conversation for security
> reasonns like the rcording they play you
> she informed me the law stated i could not use it in evidence unless i
> had her permission she declined so i said she didnt have mine she siad
> it didnt work like that.
> guess what didnt think so the csa are above the law !!!!!!!!
>
> any comments greatly recieved

With regards to the recording, virtually all call centres these days have a
recorded message to start with that says calls will be recorded for quality
or training purposes.
Those who don't want to be recorded will simply hang up - staying on the
line is an agreement to let them do that.
Just because a recording can or cannot be used in evidence doesn't mean its
not worth doing. A transcript for your own records perhaps? Or possibly copy
all relevant details to the person concerned and say thats what was agreed -
bit hard for CSA to later deny to any other body that the conversation
details are wrong if they haven't got their own details.

Hmmm....come to think of it, if DWP do ring you (CSA is part of the DWP),
then you can often get them off the phone by saying 'hang on, just starting
the recording'.
Those who have nothing to hide and are happy to be recorded won't be stopped
that way though. Most won't be like that in my experience.

Martin <><
--
http://www.cashisallyouneed.co.uk/


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Too neat to waste...
    ... Then, the experimental method, and what would constitute relevant evidence ... Since these propositions are different, ... been a multitrack 'recording' there is a risk that the 'mix' of these ... The problems I encounter with LP tend to make listening to some LPs ...
    (uk.rec.audio)
  • Re: Too neat to waste...
    ... Then, the experimental method, and what would constitute relevant evidence ... Since these propositions are different, the experiments would be different, ... been a multitrack 'recording' there is a risk that the 'mix' of these ... The problems I encounter with LP tend to make listening to some LPs ...
    (uk.rec.audio)
  • Re: shafted again
    ... You simply tell them its a recording ... clearly stated that they cannot question the CSA figures and the judges job ... UK civil court room, you won't get it and certainly don't be fool enough to ... > months at the earlyist i told the advisor that the csa standards didnt ...
    (uk.gov.agency.csa)
  • Re: Declaration by the Presidency on behalf of the European Union on the deteriorating situation of
    ... so your collaboration with the lunatic schizophrenic dementia had gone to such developed stage that now you're threatening him not to produce the evidence? ... Strangely that statement accurately reflects the law in Queensland on the recording and subsequent publication of such recordings ... ... Perhaps he could enlighten us, bearing in mind, and he is hereby cautioned, that any admission as to illegally taping a conversation may be admissible in Court and may render him liable to penalties at law. ...
    (talk.religion.bahai)
  • Re: Racist Chants.
    ... Plus recording device, does not appear to be there any more. ... and claim to have evidence that puts Celtic fans ... and then went on to add that he HAD proof that biz was ... had a recording that exonerated my teams supporters I would most definitely ...
    (uk.sport.football.clubs.rangers)
Loading