Re: polotics and money
- From: "tony" <apsp60@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:07:12 -0000
You seem to internalise all the arguments and display innapropriate distain
of anyone who apposes your viewpoint (even if justified by a sucessefull
appeal.) If your going to nail your coloures to the mast, atleast become
informed.
This point had nothing to do with child care (children act) which some of us
deal with on a professional basis anyway.
It had more to do with abuse of the system which all have an interest in, as
it's a taxpayer issue.
Even if your missing out as a resident parent, any corruption exposed would
improve the system for all by making it transparent.
Issues: parlimentry conduct, insider trading etc. The point was not about
having a pop at any group of even a self appointed moral crusader that no
one is likely to listen to.
"ACADd" <ACADd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dk5oim$mt4$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "tony" <apsp60@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:s7udnaheDLWI2PvenZ2dnUVZ8tydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> How many others stand to profit from this bottomless pit of the so called
>> Child Support Agency?
>
> A Few million CHILDREN
>
>>
>>
>
>
.
- References:
- polotics and money
- From: tony
- Re: polotics and money
- From: ACADd
- polotics and money
- Prev by Date: Re: polotics and money
- Next by Date: Re: PLEASE EXCUSE THIS OUTBURST!
- Previous by thread: Re: polotics and money
- Index(es):