Re: inside the csa


"CSA_R_SCUM" <noduff1@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1124831916.720838.55870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> persecuted wrote:
>> one question ive often thought to myself is--are there any members of
>> staff that work for the C.S.A being chased for maintanence by the
>> C.S.A?
>>
>> the reason being none of the operatives on the piss poor phone system
>> can never give you an answer to this question
>> HAVE YOU GOT KIDS OF YOUR OWN?
>> answer
>> I CANT COMMENT ON THAT SIR!
>
> The best yet, is I have been banned from phoning the CSA as they did
> not like my line of questions and the fact I recorded my phone calls. I
> now have to write to them. I now use their e.mail address so if you
> want to earn money due to their lack of compliance with responding
> within 20 days, use that address. I wrote to them in June and have yet
> to receive a reply.
>
> under the FOIA, you have a right to ask them how many of their staff
> are also paying and not paying sca payments. If they have a record of
> it they must disclose it.

But do they have a record of it?
They can certainly say how many cases are marked 'sensitive' on the computer
(needing specific access which has to be requested by the caseworker). But
thats not just staff, thats also partners, famous people, relatives and so
on.

>
> Also, under the FOIA you have a right to enquire of your ex partners
> income. Even if they are on benefit. If benefit is being paid, there is
> a duty to disclose that income as 1) it is public money and as such
> must be disclosed 2) How do you know if fraud is being undertaken if
> you dont know what they are claiming.
>

Thats a new one on me.
Not that fraud would actually make a difference to the assessment.


> I have several hours of taped phone calls with the CSA, several of
> their staff swearing at me. and many of them slamming the phone down.
> One person who worked in departures even to me to "*** Off" and when I
> phoned back and spoke to another pserson, she can be heard in the
> background telling them to just hang up on me.
>
> All you are legally obliged to do is say you recaord your calls. You
> only have to tell them once, which is what I did and they hate it.
>
> Did you know they are planning on removing a driver licences for non
> payment?
>

They have been removing driving licences for a few years now. The theory
being why should the NRP be able to avoid payment and keep driving his posh
car. Thats all down to one particular case.
Its a court decision, not a CSA decision, to remove licence. And the court
do listen to the NRP telling how he can't do without his licence. Trouble
is, if the court allows him to keep the licence then the next stage in
enforcement is commital to prison.

Martin <><


.