Critically acclaimed by everyone who knows videogames, I've finally
gotten around to play it via the recent reissue. And I just don't get
it. Granted, I've only played 40 minutes or so, but I don't see how the
controls, combat, graphics or, well, gameplay is going to improve much
later on.
It's not so much about the gameplay or graphics. It's the feeling you get
when you've played about 75% of it, then completed it.
Re: Bad Day in LA demo ...play and it was quite original, kind of a cell shaded GTA:SA in terms ... of graphics, kind of hard to describe in terms of gameplay, but quite ... (comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action)
Re: DoD:Source > Call of Duty 2 ...graphics, but for gameplay you can't beat 1.3 (which is still playable ... I probably will next time I goto play.... (And check the groups you're posting to, you're posting to a bunch of ... (comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action)
Re: Better Graphics Poorer Game Play? ... In particular the current obsession with high end graphics.... if you want to run this game on settings that will ... But I prefer games that play nice. ... eye-candy and gameplay.... (comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action)
Re: Tomb Raider Legend Demo - and System Requirments!!! ... I can't believe the developers haven't sorted out the control issue after ...graphics and great gameplay do not necessarily go together... ...Dx8 or less games can be ... (comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action)
Re: Anyone tried Rappelz yet? ...play, I might as well give it a shot. ... the graphics engine hugely lets it down. ... the game is quite fun.... skills, weapon boosting talents etc. for DPS, or mix styles. ... (alt.games.warcraft)
