Re: 360 or PS3
- From: "[ste parker]" <imaginey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:47:19 +0100
Sir Chewbury Gubbins wrote:
ste.parker@xxxxxxxxx the Monkey was never naughty:On Oct 30, 5:13 pm, Sir Chewbury Gubbins
<chewbury.gubb...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Does having a 360 sealed up in its box under the stairs, owning noYou own a game for it.
games, and having no intention to plug it in count as not having one?
Arcade purchases don't count :)
You don't even need to purchase anything! If the hexagon thing I forget the name of is free and preinstalled in all circumstances, anyway.
--
[ste]
gamertag: stefcha
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 360 or PS3
- From: deKay
- Re: 360 or PS3
- References:
- 360 or PS3
- From: Rach
- Re: 360 or PS3
- From: Shak
- Re: 360 or PS3
- From: Kendrick Kerwin Chua
- Re: 360 or PS3
- From: Shak
- Re: 360 or PS3
- From: Sir Chewbury Gubbins
- Re: 360 or PS3
- From: ste . parker
- Re: 360 or PS3
- From: Sir Chewbury Gubbins
- 360 or PS3
- Prev by Date: Re: PWB 29/10/07
- Next by Date: Re: 360 or PS3
- Previous by thread: Re: 360 or PS3
- Next by thread: Re: 360 or PS3
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|