Re: not very retro PWB

Kendrick Kerwin Chua wrote:
In article <0JOfi.193861$4a.61112@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
DBSnappa <davidjREMOVEMEboughton@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Kendrick Kerwin Chua wrote:
In article <f5o144$m7f$1@xxxxxxxx>,
Chris Stevens <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bin
---
The length of this post. Sorry. :)
But you put smut on page two, like any other find periodical. Hey, that reminds me, we need to get someome to pose topless for the next issue of UGVM magazine. :)

Now you've mentioned it I can already see the editors flannel panel pic. We're holding you personally responsible if Zo decides to pose naked for this!

Wot, Jo Guest isn't available? Not that we could afford the fee for that photography session...

Jo Guest?!?! She's cracking on a bit now.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: not very retro PWB
    ... DBSnappa wrote: ... Chris Stevens wrote: ... But you put smut on page two, ... Hey, ...
    (uk.games.video.misc)
  • Re: not very retro PWB
    ... roondog wrote: ... DBSnappa wrote: ... Chris Stevens wrote: ... But you put smut on page two, ...
    (uk.games.video.misc)
  • Re: not very retro PWB
    ... DBSnappa wrote: ... Chris Stevens wrote: ... But you put smut on page two, ... Hey, that reminds me, we need to get someome to pose topless for the next issue of UGVM magazine. ...
    (uk.games.video.misc)
  • Re: not very retro PWB
    ... DBSnappa wrote: ... Chris Stevens wrote: ... But you put smut on page two, ... Hey, ...
    (uk.games.video.misc)
  • Re: not very retro PWB
    ... DBSnappa wrote: ... Chris Stevens wrote: ... But you put smut on page two, ... Hey, that reminds me, we need to get someome to pose topless for the next issue of UGVM magazine. ...
    (uk.games.video.misc)