Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- From: Chris F <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:05:40 GMT
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:56:28 GMT, "Slitheen"
<the.slitheen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Wheel of Fortune on the NES?
"[ste parker]" <imaginey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:494pooFmuvp6U3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Badass Scotsman wrote:
Haha, when I played CODII on my 19" digital Sony at 1600 x 1200, I was
literally blown away - amazing.
When I played CODII on my 50" Pioneer Hi Def set via the 360, I vowed to
NEVER EVER play any such game on the PC again. This is the way gaming
should be. It simply knocks the socks off any PC setup, period.
Rubbish, no mouse ;)
Rare proved years ago that you can have the most sublime control in a
console FPS. I don't even need to mention the title.
--
gamertag: Chrisflynnuk
http://live.xbox.com/member/Chrisflynnuk
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- From: Skipai Otter
- Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- From: Chris F
- Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- From: [ste parker]
- Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- From: Skipai Otter
- Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- From: Badass Scotsman
- Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- From: [ste parker]
- Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- From: Slitheen
- Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- Prev by Date: Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- Next by Date: Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- Previous by thread: Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- Next by thread: Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
