Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- From: "Badass Scotsman" <badass@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:56:11 +0100
"[ste parker]" <imaginey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:494dppFn2p41U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Slitheen wrote:
"Rob R. Ainscough" <robains@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23pxk4IEVGHA.5828@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
So is XBOX 360 if you do the same comparison to a PC.
Not quite. I'm starting to see stuff for X360 that looks true next gen,
the PC will catch it fast...but not yet.
Are you still using a 486 or something? My PC has had visuals at least as
good as anything I've seen on 360 for a couple of years now, and I fall
well into "mid range".
--
[ste]
"Throw me your matches 'cause I like to burn stuff"
Agreed. Still the 360 is A lot vcheaper and B a lot comfier. Consoles
will never really outperform PC's.
Badass.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- Next by Date: Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- Previous by thread: Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- Next by thread: Re: Revolution (so far) has MASSIVELY disappointing specs: ATI, IBM didn't seem to do much for Nintendo. REV = CUBE 1.5, EXACTLY - 50 *percent* more speed/power, not *even* 2-3x
- Index(es):