Re: About off-topic and revolution

On 2005-08-23, Bobby Internet <bobbyinternet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<proposed Sega group>

> I think the group would carry more than enough traffic if its limitations
> were opened up, it would have to be a multiformat forum, an offshot to .misc
>
> I could probably post about Outrun2, that Shenmue-looky-like game and Virtua
> Tennis PSP and generate more traffic than it has seen recently if it were on
> topic. Apologies for my ramblings which are unsuitable for this group, but
> if one developer/publisher/graveyard-for-old-gamers needs their own group I
> would say it was sega to cater for all the nutters with no home to go to.
> Sorry.

Misc is generally the group for this, I really don't think Sega need
their own one seeing the traffic ugvd currently gets. Making groups
based on software publishers is madness in my opinion.

> What would it take to get it to a vote?

You would need to write a seperate RFD for removing UGVD and creating
your new group, persuade unnc that it's worthwhile, argue with fuckwits
for a couple of weeks, then hope you can get it passed without going
to a vote. I personally would vote against such a group.

--
Mike Jenkins
Dreamcast/Gamecube FAQs - http://www.kwik-e-mart.org
Mike's Auctions: http://tinyurl.com/2374h
.