Re: Billions For The Bankers



Mark <i@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 15 Sep 2009 18:57:55 GMT, fburton@xxxxxxx (Francis Burton) wrote:

The main point is though, that we're not limited to just one
planet any more.

They would have to be very valuable resources for it to be worthwhile
mining on other planets!

They would to be shipped back directly to Earth, yes. Current deltavee
costs for a mission from Earth mean that even were the Moon covered in a
layer of cut diamonds and all you had to do was take a bucket and spade,
you couldn't run it at a profit. Economically speaking, the only thing
that currently looks in the ballpark of qualifying is Helium 3 mined
from the Moon for fusion reactors on Earth.

I'm optimistic though that even if the Giant Government Bureaucracies
continue to launch missiles at the Moon, private industry will be forced
to build spaceplanes for tourists. Eventually that will get weight cost
to orbit down, and once you're in orbit, you're halfway to anywhwere in
the solar system in deltavee terms.

Nevertheless, apart from some oddities in microgee manufacturing that we
can't do on Earth (optics and materials look most likely) material
resources harvested in space or on other bodies will be used entirely to
supply and resupply bases and infrastucture in space, mainly because it
costs a hell of a lot to loft them from earth. First use will be mining
lunar regolith to cover a lnar base and at as a radiation shield. Sooner
or later robots will mine Mars to make fuel for visiting astronauts to
get around and even to get back to Earth. The only real import to Earth
for a while will be solar power beamed down from solar power satellites.

In the longer term, some of the exotic carbon materials are only an
order of magnitude short in the strength needed to put up beanstalks
(lifts to geostationary orbit and beyond). Once we get those up, space
is just a rather tedious lift journey straight up and down. No doubt the
first guys to build 'em will do about as well as the Channel Tunnel
folks, but when their initial bonds collapse and they go bankrupt, costs
to orbit will fall dramatically. After that, the solar system is our
oyster.

The galaxy will take a little longer. Space between stars really is
kinda big.

FoFP

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Space port/dock/ship yard location
    ... to increase human presence across the solar system. ... regular flights operate between Earth and Moon. ... Once sufficient capacity is available on orbit, ... These are powere by laser beams from orbit, ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • News: Long Shot - Planet Could Hit Earth in Distant Future.
    ... Planet Could Hit Earth in Distant Future ... Our solar system has a potentially violent future. ... a large disruption of Mercury's orbit. ... Basically, the planets can ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: food from space
    ... Look at the value of land on Earth and how it varies per unit area ... In a polar orbit, with GPS guided aeroshells launched from a low ... flash that imparts thrust to the asteroid itself, ... boron in bulk costs $2,500 per kg, or $2.5 milion. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Mars colonization versus Stanford Torus
    ... to build space colonies for their employees. ... assume no further change in the situation, then space settlement ... On earth the standard practice for those with such time and such ... Can we start High Frontier with current costs to orbit? ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Mars expeditions (was Re: Proposed sample return mission to Phobos)
    ... but our Earth transportation infrastructure is significantly more advanced than our space infrastructure. ... I'm sure a more advanced system could improve on steam, but that would require much R&D and much higher capital costs, and the market wouldn't support it. ... But you're talking about soft landing many tens or even hundreds of tonnes of equipment on the Moon right there. ... cost, including warehousing your stuff on Phobos for many months at a time until a good launch window comes along, and so on. ...
    (sci.space.policy)

Loading