Re: Vat cut



PeterSaxton wrote:

On 23 Nov, 13:14, Ronald Raygun <no.s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"Troy Steadman" <troystead...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
On 23 Nov, 11:17, mogga <d...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

How many systems have to be changed? And what's ther impact on
pricing?

No systems need changing. There is no impact on pricing except to the
end user - things in the shops are cheaper for you and me.

Oh, so my receipt from (e.g.) the car rental company will still say
cost of hire: 59.57, VAT: 10.43, total: 70.00 will it?

(and this is a personal purchase for me)

Which part of "except to the end user" did you not understand, end user?

You seem to have a problem with sentences.

Not in the slightest. I'm a big fan of sentences.

There's two questions and two answers. You seem to think that the
answer to the second question relates partly to the first question.

Well, I didn't and don't think that, nor can I see how I can have
seemed to think that.

There were indeed two questions (by mogga) and two answers (by Troy),
being one answer to each question. Then there followed one comment
(by tim).

I addressed only that comment, which I took to refer to the second
answer only. Mind you, I suppose it's possible that the comment
referred to the first answer only. Either way the comment was
inappropriate, because ...

Systems will need changing to reflect the change in the VAT rate.

.... as someone else has already pointed out, systems do not need
changing. The system was conveniently designed to incorporate knobs,
and all that would be necessary is to adjust one of them (this doesn't
change the system, it only changes the answers it spews out). OK, so
some difficulty could arise from the fact that the relevant knob has
not needed to be adjusted for nearly two decades and has, in a manner
of speaking, "rusted solid". Knowledge of how to twiddle it has
atrophied. That's hardly the system's fault.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Vat cut
    ... answer to the second question relates partly to the first question. ... (by tim). ... The system was conveniently designed to incorporate knobs, ... and all that would be necessary is to adjust one of them (this doesn't ...
    (uk.finance)
  • Re: complex custom fill series with formula
    ... For your first question: ... Adjust for the correct last column in the INDEX ... For your second question: ... I'd also like to know how to do the above if the second reference ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.misc)
  • Re: Two Questions
    ... First question pretty much answered already.. ... > to pass a test for the .net certification. ... > Second Question: ... > another newsgroup to post to. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • Re: how can i untain $ARGV from a perl script extending snmp? [solved]
    ... I can't answer your second question, but as for your first question, take a look at web sites such as: ... As it says, you need to clean tainted data by running a regular expression over it and *then* selecting some part of it using a sub-pattern. ... You might want to at least check if it is an absolute path, any ..'s in it, or if the path is within some part of the directory structure which you accept. ...
    (perl.beginners)
  • Re: Fermats Last theorem short proof
    ... I may have forgotten to answer your second question ... What about my first question? ... For a purpose of FLT I have defined as ... That can't be generalized to n where n is odd integer, the generalization would be something looks different from the identity I have already established for n when it is odd prime only. ...
    (sci.math)

Loading