Re: BACS v CHAPS
- From: GSV Three Minds in a Can <GSV@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 09:01:20 +0100
Bitstring <1175292879.678773.250770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, from the wonderful person ian.tomes@xxxxxxxxx said
On 30 Mar, 11:47, "LSR" <nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I just had a Northern Rock fixed-term investment mature. They say
"unfortunately we can't transfer the balance by BACS to your bank account";
the only options to get the money are a cheque by post, or a CHAPS transfer
which costs me £35.
Why can't they use BACS? (which I believe should cost 70p or so). Cheques do
have the habit of getting lost in the post - assuming they get sent in the
first place - and it's probably real hassle getting a replacement issued.
--
LSR
Given that the form gives a choice of Cheque or CHAPS but not BACS, I
would suggest that this is NR ensuring they avoid the situation where
an investment is greater in value than the BACS limit of £10,000. If
they dont give the option they cant end up having to go back and make
different arrangements.
What BACS limit? I frequently move more than that by BACS, and AFAIK the banking system uses BACS for even larger amounts than me (add several zeroes)?
--
GSV Three Minds in a Can
8,013 Km walked. 1,453Km PROWs surveyed. 26.4% complete.
.
- References:
- BACS v CHAPS
- From: LSR
- Re: BACS v CHAPS
- From: ian . tomes
- BACS v CHAPS
- Prev by Date: Re: Typical bank loans...
- Next by Date: Re: credit card nightmare
- Previous by thread: Re: BACS v CHAPS
- Next by thread: Re: BACS v CHAPS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|