Re: Very Basic Tax Question
- From: Peter Saxton <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:15:51 +0000
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:44:46 -0000, "Miss L. Toe"
<missltoemissltoe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Ronald Raygun" <no.spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:HY%vh.3816$9S5.1142@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Miss L. Toe wrote:
The HMRC page is very ugly and confusing. They should have had oneassuming there are no complications (like investment income, sales
commission, annual bonus):
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/rates/it.htm
Then you can earn:
5225+2150+33300 = 40675 before you pay at 40%
Incorrect. You have made two mistakes (well 3 actually if you include
botching up quoting the original text by not having enough '>'s):
(1) 5225 relates to 2007/8 whereas 2150/33300 relate to 2006/7.
I blame that one on HMRC changing the colum headings half way down..
(2) 33300 *includes* the 2150.
Guilty - I shall go back to sleep for the rest of the day.
chart with "not yet decided" in the appropriate columns.
--
Peter Saxton from London
peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Very Basic Tax Question
- From: Ed_Zep
- Re: Very Basic Tax Question
- From: Miss L. Toe
- Re: Very Basic Tax Question
- From: Ronald Raygun
- Re: Very Basic Tax Question
- From: Miss L. Toe
- Very Basic Tax Question
- Prev by Date: Re: Inheritance tax on gifts
- Next by Date: Re: Inheritance tax on gifts
- Previous by thread: Re: Very Basic Tax Question
- Next by thread: Tax refunded in the year
- Index(es):