Re: Liverpool Victoria in serious trouble
- From: "Matt Robertson" <matt_robertson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 13:00:36 GMT
"Jim" <default@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dn5kb25fepq93g13q559bafdptclq78dao@xxxxxxxxxx
Beg to differ Matt.
Straight from my Wesleyan (Stakeholder With Profits) statement:
value 5 Apr 2006, vs 6 Apr 2005. The increase is 21.8% !!!!
And of course the accompanying letter was singing their own praises
about their wonderful performance. Fair enough
So well done Wesleyan; Liverpool Victoria definately suck.
Jim
I'm sorry fella, but unless you've paid a significant amount into the fund
into it, 'your' fund value has not increased by 21.8% over the last year,
it's just not going to happen in the current climate, if ever.
Again, it's apples and pears, I'm not 100% sure what you're looking it, but
it's not like for like and I'd be surprised it the actual value of the
Wesleyan fund had increase by much more than 1.5% over the last 12 months.
Maybe you are reading the underlying fund growth, very little of this would
have been passed on to investors. When you've got the correct figures, I
suspect your initial reaction would be that they both 'suck'.
Regards,
Matt.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Liverpool Victoria in serious trouble
- From: Jim
- Re: Liverpool Victoria in serious trouble
- From: Daytona
- Re: Liverpool Victoria in serious trouble
- References:
- Liverpool Victoria in serious trouble
- From: Jim
- Re: Liverpool Victoria in serious trouble
- From: Matt Robertson
- Re: Liverpool Victoria in serious trouble
- From: Jim
- Liverpool Victoria in serious trouble
- Prev by Date: Re: Liverpool Victoria in serious trouble
- Next by Date: Re: prepaid credit card
- Previous by thread: Re: Liverpool Victoria in serious trouble
- Next by thread: Re: Liverpool Victoria in serious trouble
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|