Re: Banding of homes for energy efficiency



In message <4491ba43$0$3602$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Saunby <msaunby2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
"John Beardmore" <wookie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eOsIZ0bEnRkEFw45@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Again, why not just look at the bills?

Because if nobody ever uses the toilet, it won't have any impact on the
water consumption ?

In short, they tell you f.all() about what you're buying !

Thanks. This pretty much confirms what I suspected. It's not what people
live in, but how they live that is the biggest factor in whether the
environment (and their pocket) suffers.

No - that's not what I said at all.

The point is that some people will live with little impact because of their habits, others because of their domestic infrastructure. Both have an effect, and utility bills don't differentiate between the two. That doesn't mean that infrastructure has a marginal effect.

I suspect our family of four produces far less carbon dioxide now, than I did living on my own in this house alone 20 years ago. This is simply because in those days we had coal fires, a crap gas heater, crap windows and not a lot of insulation. 7 centigrade was the sort of temperature at which I'd end up sitting working at a desk.

These days, we have a modern condensing boiler, have extended the house with a better insulated envelope, have few drafts, and a much more even heat distribution. Although we run the house at 17 to 19 centigrade, our winter fuel bills don't seem to be too bad, and they are typically under a fiver for the summer quarter as the solar heating kicks in then.


Though you will no doubt contend that how much fuel a person uses isn't a
useful measure of anything

Well - it tells you a lot about what they'll consume and emit, but nothing about why, what they achieve by it, environmental impacts vs societal benefits, or the context in which it happened.


I'd still be more interested in seeing stats for
energy usage against housing age, size, location, income level, education,
than "energy efficiency ratings" - since I reckon that wouldn't tell you
very much at all about future energy needs, etc. whereas the others might
suggest ways in which society might be persuaded to use less fuel.

But that isn't the question that house buyers are trying to answer is
it ?


Cheers, J/.
--
John Beardmore
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Use of Extension Cord
    ... >> If it takes a given amount of energy to raise the temperature of one ... >> of energy to lower the temperature of one pound of water one degree ... It was to explain that the electricity board most likely have worked out the economics of the house supply wire thickness, just as they have with the national grid. ... with wiring on your end designed to support ...
    (sci.electronics.basics)
  • Re: crawlspace temperature, humidity
    ... The goethermal heatpump was installed before I bought the house, ... can't say for sure how much energy savings I'm getting. ... If you do get a geothermal heatpump, make sure the installer properly ...
    (alt.home.repair)
  • Re: Yet another broken promise from the Democrats
    ... They withdraw energy bill amendment to raise standards ... WASHINGTON - House Democrats decided Wednesday not to try to raise fuel ... their support behind a more modest fuel efficiency increase proposed by Rep. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Yet another broken promise from the Democrats
    ... They withdraw energy bill amendment to raise standards ... House Democrats decided Wednesday not to try to raise fuel ... centerpiece of an energy bill the Senate approved in June. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Sad Memory apology and random thoughts
    ... Now trying to sort through 60 years of stuff at my mom's house. ... endless energy. ... > Brent, great to see ya posting again. ... > raymond dot boyce3 at verizon dot net ...
    (rec.music.makers.guitar.acoustic)