Re: Nuclear back on
- From: John Beardmore <wookie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 22:44:13 +0100
In message <2693725oo7g5dq407uo2vathk2otgebrem@xxxxxxx>, David Hansen <SENDdavidNOhSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
On Sun, 21 May 2006 16:59:05 +0100 someone who may be AJH
<sylva@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote this:-
BTW I do not advocate nuclear electricity, I just accept it has become
inevitable we take that route, mainly from international competition.
International competition for what?
Those countries with cheaper power will have a competitive advantage.
Then we'd better not build any more nuclear power stations.
Ah yes, but it's 'power now, pay later', which is very appealing to TPTB !
Or if Oz is reading, maybe 'power now, pour later'.
Cheers, J/.
--
John Beardmore
.
- References:
- Re: Nuclear back on
- From: John Beardmore
- Re: Nuclear back on
- From: alexterrell
- Re: Nuclear back on
- From: John Beardmore
- Re: Nuclear back on
- From: alexterrell
- Re: Nuclear back on
- From: John Beardmore
- Re: Nuclear back on
- From: alexterrell
- Re: Nuclear back on
- From: David Hansen
- Re: Nuclear back on
- From: David Hansen
- Re: Nuclear back on
- Prev by Date: Re: Nuclear back on
- Next by Date: Re: Nuclear back on
- Previous by thread: Re: Nuclear back on
- Next by thread: Re: Nuclear back on
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|