Re: Nuclear back on

In message <i1937256c8r8gjkkhgoh9h1cnfja00cvqi@xxxxxxx>, David Hansen <SENDdavidNOhSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
On Fri, 19 May 2006 19:28:42 +0100 someone who may be John Beardmore
<wookie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote this:-

To nit pick then, the combustion is fine, but you want to do something
more elaborate with the emissions.

It might not be an either/or question. A fluidised bed might be one
way of dealing with some aspects of both.

Agreed.


Cheers, J/.
--
John Beardmore
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Nuclear back on
    ... more elaborate with the emissions. ... way of dealing with some aspects of both. ... I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me ...
    (uk.environment)
  • Re: Does VCL have a future?
    ... Then let me elaborate. ... If I'm developing an "Oh look, live data, not one line of code." ... I'm more efficient with VCL ... When I'm dealing with reality and I need to develop a .NET application and I intend to use the FCL, ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: Unable to print from the internet with Vista
    ... dealing with these problems. ... please elaborate on your reference ... to HP Navigator. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.vista.print_fax_scan)
  • Re: Renewables in power cuts
    ... suspect their behaviour can be considered in aggregate. ... industry is well used to dealing with. ... John Beardmore. ...
    (uk.environment)
  • Re: Carbon Cards on BBC breakfast
    ... John Beardmore wrote: ... we'd need to cut CO2 emissions by a factor of six to stabilise our ... Carbon emissions reduction is not ...
    (uk.environment)