Re: Nuclear back on
- From: John Beardmore <wookie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 13:14:07 +0100
In message <JkCag.70621$wl.65381@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, gentlegreen <gentlegreengiantcalciumcarbonate@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes
"David Hansen" <SENDdavidNOhSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:j60k62pq8gcdjsd3o80sc4u8vhe50h0k1p@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 16 May 2006 17:13:34 +0100 someone who may be mogga
<di@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote this:-
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4987196.stm
>
>(Blair) ... will say Britain faces the prospect of being largely
>reliant on foreign gas imports for its future energy needs.
>
>So is he planning on making gas in these nuclear power stations?
Or making oil.
I don't think it is an accident that many party politicians appear
unable to grasp the difference between energy and electricity (just
one form of energy).
Of course they all got to university pre- national curriculum.
You'd think a basic science O-level would be a pre-requisite for any post
relating to energy.
(the south facing part of my roof is available for solar panels by the way
if anyone in government is reading this
You might get some subsidy via the Low Carbon Buildings Program ?
- either that or I'll have a
subsidised micro-CHP unit please)
Not sure those are covered. Grounds source heat pump ?
Cheers, J/.
--
John Beardmore
.
- References:
- Nuclear back on
- From: mogga
- Re: Nuclear back on
- From: David Hansen
- Re: Nuclear back on
- From: gentlegreen
- Nuclear back on
- Prev by Date: Re: Nuclear back on
- Next by Date: Re: Nuclear back on
- Previous by thread: Re: Nuclear back on
- Next by thread: Re: Nuclear back on
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|