Re: Parlaiment Committee on Nuclear Power
- From: John Beardmore <wookie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:34:16 +0100
In message <djj9il$e8v$1$8302bc10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Paul E. Bennett <peb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
John Beardmore wrote:In message <p2fml15osvrr83e6ihs93gqr4o6fmjv81d@xxxxxxx>, David Hansen <SENDdavidNOhSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writesOn Sat, 22 Oct 2005 13:22:04 +0100 someone who may be "Paul E. Bennett" <peb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote this:-
District heating means having smaller power stations located nearer to population centres. The large coal fired plants were a mistake in my view because they do not fit in with district heating.
Agreed !! Same for all large plants !
It's a shame that someone messed up the quoting there. I did not write that paragraph. However, I do think that several opportunities were lost in not installing district heating loops with thermal power stations.
You mean "District heating means ... do not fit in with district heating" ?
My machine says Hansen wrote it. See above ?
Cheers, J/. -- John Beardmore .
- Prev by Date: Hatfield Town Centre
- Next by Date: BBC news wind story
- Previous by thread: Re: Parlaiment Committee on Nuclear Power
- Next by thread: Re: Parlaiment Committee on Nuclear Power
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|