Re: Parlaiment Committee on Nuclear Power
- From: David Hansen <SENDdavidNOhSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:46:07 +0100
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 11:15:08 +0100 someone who may be John Beardmore
<wookie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote this:-
>Agreed, but solar thermal doesn't usually displace electricity, so much
>as gas, oil etc.
Solartwin argue that 20% of the environmental benefits from their
competitors systems are lost due to using high power electric pumps.
Imagination have also gone for the low flow, low power, solar
powered pump approach.
>> However, a Stirling based Generator would suffice if one
>>wanted to do such a conversion.
>
>It would, but it wouldn't be cheap.
Indeed. Did I see a figure of £3-4000 (installed) for a gas boiler
with Stirling engine electricity unit?
>> This provides power in
>>localities, even to individual households, without any need to rely on the
>>transmission network. Granted that the power generated is not enough for
>>all the needs of a house
>
>Unless the wind is blowing with nobody home. (Or they just don't use
>much power ? It does happen !)
People's electricity meters, if they have one with an aluminium
disc, do indeed run backwards for much of the day. Of course they
don't run backwards very fast compared to how fast they run forwards
when a washing machine is heating water.
>There isn't much excuse these
>days for running into metal objects in fog. If ships can avoid other
>moving shipping, I hope they can manage to avoid stationary objects like
>wind turbines and the shore.
Or oil rigs, which are a rather smaller radar target than a wind
farm.
>Question is, when will "All new residential and non-residential
>development (either new build, conversion, or renovation) will be
>expected to incorporate on-site renewable energy equipment to provide at
>least 10% of the developments energy needs" ?
>
>'Cos it sure aim happening at the moment. Maybe 'son of Clear Skies'
>will help, but right now most builds I'm involved with are designed by
>the clueless who may want or tolerate a little green garnish on the
>side.
There is a small step in the Westminster parliament at the moment
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4284502.stm
--
David Hansen, Edinburgh | PGP email preferred-key number F566DA0E
I will always explain revoked keys, unless the UK government
prevents me by using the RIP Act 2000.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Parlaiment Committee on Nuclear Power
- From: John Beardmore
- Re: Parlaiment Committee on Nuclear Power
- Prev by Date: Re: Parlaiment Committee on Nuclear Power
- Next by Date: Re: Parliament Committee on Nuclear Power
- Previous by thread: Re: Parlaiment Committee on Nuclear Power
- Next by thread: Re: Parlaiment Committee on Nuclear Power
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|