Re: college assignment - need some pointers



In message <eZOdnf0DYIhOz8feRVnysw@xxxxxxxxx>, Phil Bradshaw <philbradshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
John Beardmore wrote:

Well, it's all around: 'reduce, re-use, recycle', in that order: in the
legislation.

Some people would add 'recover' to the above list.

As in full spectrum recycling?

Don't know. Not heard that term before. 'Recover' is just another layer or option in the hierarchy.



However, find anywhere that does the first two first - best
part of 1000litre of waste storage capacity per household (hereabouts
anyway, plus as many compost bins as you want) encourages the opposite.

Yes.


But... if you don't take it home then you don't have it to recycle. Simple
really.

Recycling first is the wrong message. That's my argument anyway. :-)

Agreed.

Heh. Try convincing LAs of that.

Trouble is, it's not really under their control.

They could try appealing to the public to avoid packaging for example, but that either risks contravention of the hygiene regulations, or an increased rate of goods damaged prior to use. How green would that be ? At least some packaging is there for a reason.

I suspect that councils also fear that business might feel that hey were interfering in commercial decisions around presentation of goods for sale, and the advertising implicit in that. And its not as if most shops have much control over the packaging of the goods they sell anyway.

Then there's the packaging regulations, which are sufficiently complex that councils probably won't want to issue advice on packaging in case they get it embarrassingly wrong.

At the end of the day, the business lobby has much more clout with councils than the environmental lobby too.


Cheers, J/. -- John Beardmore .



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Haulage company liability
    ... There can be no question about the carriage fee - they ... failed to transport the goods with due dilligence*. ... would have difficulty claiming the damage was due to inadequate packaging. ... enclosing a cheque. ...
    (uk.transport)
  • Re: Returning goods bought online
    ... >> that you wish to return the goods. ... If the vendor did not inform you of that right (a returns ... > You have 7 working days to return the goods in their unopened packaging. ... and the regulations only specify that the goods must be unopened if they are ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Returning goods bought online
    ... > Obviously the packaging has been opened,along with all bits that came ... wish to return the goods. ... If the vendor did not inform you of that right (a returns policy on a web ... As your complaint is that the picture quality is poor, ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Packaging
    ... Consumers have a choice to buy things not so heavily packaged ... (and often there is no need for packaging at all, ... whether it's goods, food, money or packaging. ... They didn't need efficient rubbish collection because most things would ...
    (uk.politics.misc)
  • Re: New Legislation?
    ... >> in many shops 'cos the packaging is damaged. ... > Yep - But you can blame that on the Sale of Goods Act!!! ... the reason behind that was that it was cheaper to have bulk produced sizes ... for all vitamin pills and while say a vitamin C tablet might be small and ...
    (uk.people.silversurfers)