Re: Renewables in power cuts
- From: Andy Baxter <news4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 17:00:25 +0100
John Beardmore said:
> In message
> <pan.2005.09.30.22.41.45.350600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andy
> Baxter <news4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
>>mogga said:
>
>>I've been volunteering at a place in lancashire who have been running
>>without any mains electricity for years - they have enough power to run a
>>house and another building (including a TV and computer), and only run out
>>of energy 4-5 times a year.
>
> Quite. This will be using normal inverters though. These cannot be
> connected to the mains, and frequently have square wave output.
Yes, they use a 240V modified square wave inverter with 240-600V
transformers at either end to transfer the current down the hill from the
windmill to where they live. The windmill is connected to a big battery
bank, which stores enough energy for several days use.
> A mains connected inverter must match the frequency and phase of the
> mains supply to deliver energy and avoid damage, i.e. it must be a
> synchronous inverter. Further, to meet UK specifications, it must
> shutdown if the grid fails, if only to avoid scenarios like putting
> power out onto a line when it has been shut down for maintenance. The
> specifications G57, G77 or G83 as above etc, are pretty much cast in
> stone. The inverter manufacture has little scope for whimsy or
> innovation.
Yes, but it would be technically possible to have the inverter disconnect
from the grid, but continue to supply current to the house from a battery
bank (maybe with a very short break when the grid came up again while it
resynchronised with the grid phase). Effectively what these
manufacturers have chosen to do is use the grid as the battery bank, and
count on the fact that in most places it's pretty rare to have a 100%
power cut. I.e. they've gone for a simpler spec to make the whole thing
cheaper, which is what I meant - the reasons are more economic and
regulatory than technical. (Unless the setup I've described is explicitly
forbidden by the specs, in which case I take your point).
--
http://www.niftybits.ukfsn.org/
remove 'n-u-l-l' to email me. html mail or attachments will go in the spam
bin unless notified with [html] or [attachment] in the subject line.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Renewables in power cuts
- From: John Beardmore
- Re: Renewables in power cuts
- References:
- Renewables in power cuts
- From: mogga
- Re: Renewables in power cuts
- From: Andy Baxter
- Re: Renewables in power cuts
- From: John Beardmore
- Renewables in power cuts
- Prev by Date: Re: Renewables in power cuts
- Next by Date: Re: Renewables in power cuts
- Previous by thread: Re: Renewables in power cuts
- Next by thread: Re: Renewables in power cuts
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|