Re: How many races of humans are there?

On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 00:46:10 -0800 (PST), "John M."
<john_howard_morgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jan 30, 11:29 pm, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:46:37 -0800 (PST), "John M."

<john_howard_mor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 30, 6:16 pm, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 01:23:18 -0800 (PST), "John M."

<john_howard_mor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 29, 10:34 pm, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:49:58 -0800 (PST), "John M."

<john_howard_mor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 28, 11:56 pm, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:54:26 -0800 (PST), "John M."

<john_howard_mor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snip>

Fact: solutions of copper(2) salts in water are blue.
Hypothesis: The blue colour is due to d-shell electrons of the Cu(H2O)
4++ ion interacting with white light.

The first is not a scientific fact; it's a natural occurrence that
occurred long before "science" was even thought of.

Nope. The blue colour was not associated with copper(2) salts until
well after Alchemy had evolved into Chemistry

Are you saying it never occurred naturally?

So don't claim what isn't "yours".

The second is only a theory.

Nope. It's a hypothesis all right. You need to take a course of
English that includes an introduction to synonyms.

Perhaps you should.

Why would that be? I already know a synonym for 'hypothesis' is
'theory'

Which is what I said.

No it isn't. What you said is written large right below this line.

So the sum total is a fat zero.

By which you meant that what I said was a hypothesis was actually a
theory and thus I was wrong. So you did not know "theory" =
"hypothesis" when you wrote that. Once more we see your mendacious
streak, which you obviously use to advantage when plying your trade.

You're confused :-))

One minute you're accusing me of "not knowing" and the next of
mendacity because I do know.

If you offer ignorance of some fact then I would say,"you don't know"
If that ignorance was a pretence, and you later reveal you knew all
along, you were clearly lying. There is no contradiction.

You're a laugh a minute if you weren't such a Hitler admirer.

Where did I express any admiration for Hitler.

You're so embarrassed you've snipped it :-(

It would have to be
strange for someone with Jewish family and friends to admire anti-
semitism, wouldn't you think. Ahh... but it's well known on this ng
that you don't think, period.

Even worse! Are you a member of the neo-nazis?






The total adds up to A.McM being disingenuous. Your business affairs
have certainly improved your capacity for mendacity.

I am beginning to form an impression that when you are starting to
find the going difficult you edge towards personal insult and abuse.
There have been one or two posts where I feel your replies are
intended to be insulting. Are you incapable of holding your own in
open debate without that.

I am beginning to form an impression that when you are starting to
find the going difficult you edge towards cutting and pasting someone
else's words. There have been one or two posts where I feel your
replies are not your words but simply ones copied from anothers'
posts. Are you incapable of holding your own in open debate without
that.

If you can find a real person called h lantus who wrote this you might
be right. But there's no chance you ac

I didn't think you could.

If I knew what "ac" meant... However, you identified him in another
thread. You've got a short memory, haven't you.
<snip>

H Lantus wasn't a real person it was the pseudonym from a lying little
crook from Penrith.



I see you can't cope with being called a duff scientist :-))

It means absolutely nothing coming from one who makes money by non-
violently mugging old ladies for their life savings.

What evidence do you have for this?

Exactly the same calibre of evidence you use for calling people "duff"
scientists.

Duff scientists are self evident when they support fake conservation.

If you'd an 'O'-grade in English you could've corrected yourself when
you trashed the language, as you did above


Like what?


Especially the ones that admire Hitler and his thugs.

Here's another point to measure against your specious argument
concerning Nazis.

Adolf Hitler was anti-abortion. Jesse Jackson is anti-abortion.

Backing what you see as old Adolph's good points again ;-(

What
is your position on abortion, Angus? Are you with, or against, Jesse
and Adolf?

As you say I don't think, how could I possibly comment?

Should it not be for the woman to decide?

What's your position?


..

Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How many races of humans are there?
    ... have certainly improved your capacity for mendacity. ... There have been one or two posts where I feel your replies are ... Jesse Jackson is anti-abortion. ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: How many races of humans are there?
    ... "Hitler was a superb orator. ... have certainly improved your capacity for mendacity. ... There have been one or two posts where I feel your replies are ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: How many races of humans are there?
    ... "Hitler was a superb orator. ... have certainly improved your capacity for mendacity. ... There have been one or two posts where I feel your replies are ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: Current gold price?
    ... even a majority of posts. ... >Timbo, I dont prevent anybody to do as he please. ... It seems to me that your attitude has inspired their attacks ...
    (soc.culture.thai)
  • Re: Math mode wackiness in memoir class.
    ... replied to your posts. ... part of your posting as provided to me by my NNTP ... A Google Groups employee has recently been interfering with my postings ...
    (comp.text.tex)