Re: Squirrels for dinner
- From: Robert Seago <rjseago@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 20:00:47 +0100
In article <8c4i049se03c2ieuupflj9nb0b0rd7pmig@xxxxxxx>,
<amacmil304@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Couldn't agree more!
You do know that the post you agree with was a forgery I suppose?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Squirrels for dinner
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Squirrels for dinner
- References:
- Squirrels for dinner
- From: Robert Seago
- Re: Squirrels for dinner
- From: BAC
- Re: Squirrels for dinner
- From: John M.
- Re: Squirrels for dinner
- From: Robert Seago
- Re: Squirrels for dinner
- From: John M.
- Re: Squirrels for dinner
- From: amacmil304
- Squirrels for dinner
- Prev by Date: Re: Sloppy science from the Royal ***?
- Next by Date: Re: Sloppy science from the Royal ***?
- Previous by thread: Re: Squirrels for dinner
- Next by thread: Re: Squirrels for dinner
- Index(es):
