Re: Angus can't answer

On Feb 29, 1:30 am, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:27:21 -0800 (PST), "John M."



<john_howard_mor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 27, 11:57 pm, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:08:57 -0800 (PST), "John M."

<john_howard_mor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 27, 6:37 pm, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:46:31 -0800 (PST), "John M."

<john_howard_mor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 27, 11:41 am, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:28:08 -0800 (PST), "John M."
<john_howard_mor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 26, 1:42 pm, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
<snip>
The CON in conservation is there for all to see - for those who look
closely enough.

Your point being...................?

That so-called conservation is a CON.

Han*** said, "You can't fool all of the people all of the time". If
we accept this aphorism, how come the RSPB has 1.1 million members who
all accept the value of what that organisation says it wishes to
achieve. More members, I suspect, than your counter operation - the
name of which escapes me for the moment?

The Nazi party was supported by almost the whole of Germany until it
was found out.

I think you will find that National Socialist governments were not
that well liked, although opinion polls were not around in those days
to verify such a supposition. Their great "success", however, was in
rabble rousing through using inflammatory words against a certain
segment of the population. We see the same thing happening today as
in, say, vilification of conservationists.

Engendering hatred of people different to you is not your invention,
Angus, but I see you like to do it anyway. And you have the nerve to
brand *us*, "Nazi", a word designed to arouse intense, knee-jerk
dislike :-(

Will you be extra-ordinarily rendering us by rail or air to your work
(ahem) camps?

Quite the reverse - if you lot ever got power.

More inflammatory cant. Most conservationists I know are humanists,
and such behaviour is anathema to their philosophy. You on the other
hand have already proposed executing people for minor offenses and
even for their intrinsic natures - you'd make a great ayatollah.

What minor offences would people commit to be executed?

Angus Macmillanwww.roots-of-blood.org.ukwww.killhunting.orgwww.con-servation.org.uk

Poaching.

.

Quantcast