Re: Angus can't answer

On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:19:47 -0800 (PST), "John M."
<john_howard_morgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Feb 24, 3:30 pm, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:41:46 -0800 (PST), "John M."



<john_howard_mor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 23, 9:46 pm, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 10:03:56 -0800 (PST), "John M."

<john_howard_mor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 23, 6:16 pm, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:50:21 -0800 (PST), "John M."

<john_howard_mor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 23, 10:22 am, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:07:29 -0800 (PST), "John M."

<john_howard_mor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 22, 9:56 pm, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:23:07 -0800 (PST), "John M."

<john_howard_mor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 21, 11:31 pm, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:18:29 -0800 (PST), "John M."

<john_howard_mor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 20, 8:39 pm, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:35:35 +0000, Malcolm

<Malc...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <ttkor3lrin8n7qp1e7n42urlro97cd6...@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil...@xxxxxxx writes
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:33:50 +0000, Malcolm
<Malc...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <iader3l1e9ncatqkrh37e8ghiqhkc7g...@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil...@xxxxxxx writes
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:01:03 +0000, Malcolm
<Malc...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <gvldr31kel5n4a65deq5rf83odhbgdg...@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil...@xxxxxxx writes
Malcolm has repeatedly refuted my claims on this newsgroup that dogs
disturb wildlife.

However, the access group of which he is chairman say differently.

Malcolm the liar - caught out again!

How typical that Angus starts his latest attack on me with a lie :-(

Still, it's good to see how interested he is in outdoor access :-))

Don't compound the lie, Malcolm.

For months you banged on about how dogs didn't disturb wildlife.

Don't lie, Angus.

You claimed, repeatedly, that dogs disturbed wildlife. What I, and
others, did was to ask you for some examples. Perhaps you would like to
repeat what you said at the time.

I seem to remember saying that the RSPB didn't allow dogs because they
disturbed wildlife and it was obvious the Woodland Trust didn't care.

Look it up yourself.

Ah, the typical Angus answer. Unable to provide evidence to back up his
claims, he tells the person requesting the evidence to provide it
themselves :-(

I'm not like you, Malcolm. I don't xarchive my posts. Anyone can
look them up if they're keen enough.

I'm keen. Please supply the Usenet Reference No. for the post I need
to look up.

That would mean I had to look it up.

And you are unable to do that? Malcolm's explanation goes up another
notch in my scorecard. Now, let's try again. You posted something so
you can find it easily compared to me. So let me have the reference
number for the post, please.

If you're keen, do it yourself.

If I have to......

Good. You have to. It's all on record.

So it is. And no wonder you didn't want to draw attention to it - it's
100% confirmation of your mendacity. How could you possibly write such
things.

Sounds like you've reached another conclusion from your sloppy
scientific mind.

So what did it say? Or are you just lying?

Why don't you just post the reference for all to see? Or are you just
lying?

You do it since you found it. Or are you just lying?

It's your intellectual property and I wouldn't want to infringe any
copyrights, so just you go ahead and post for both of us. Or are you
ashamed of what you wrote, as you should be.

See above.

Ah, yes. Now where have I seen that before?

See above.

See below.

All falsehood passes through three stages:
First, it is examined;
Second, it is patiently queried; and
Third, it is rejected as Angus's nonsense.
John H. Morgan (19xx - 20??)


More sloppy science :-))

You've run out of steam, John.


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Angus cant answer
    ... disturb wildlife. ... repeat what you said at the time. ... John. ... above to see who ran out of steam first and posted: ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: Angus cant answer
    ... disturb wildlife. ... 100% confirmation of your mendacity. ... John. ... above to see who ran out of steam first and posted: ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: Angus cant answer
    ... disturb wildlife. ... repeat what you said at the time. ... 100% confirmation of your mendacity. ... Or are you just lying? ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: Angus cant answer
    ... disturb wildlife. ... repeat what you said at the time. ... 100% confirmation of your mendacity. ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: Angus cant answer
    ... disturb wildlife. ... repeat what you said at the time. ... Or are you just lying? ... Why don't you just post the reference for all to see? ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)