Re: Just for a laugh



On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:04:24 +0000, Malcolm
<Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


In article <clp1q3dbknap7hjn9l39se1n2q2kcq8tgr@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:21:35 +0000, Malcolm
<Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


In article <qjd1q3h5v8503pur38hm7k3088ah70lmbj@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:38:07 +0000, Malcolm
<Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


In article <ug71q39vhtlfghhjel3f2jrlbeea2kcnq5@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes

But it's fun watching a conceited fool making a fool of himself time
after time :-))

If you really thought that, you wouldn't respond. You've just admitted
again that you just can't cope with my level of knowledge and expertise
on the subjects you keep posting about, whether deer, squirrels, trees,
woods, management, ecology, native and non-native species, lichens,
etc., etc., etc.


No Malcolm. It's quite the reverse. If you look at the posting
history it's you who mainly responds to my initial posts.

Of course I do. Your wild and unsubstantiated claims need challenging so
that people are not taken in by them.

You really are rather dim, Malcolm. And after all this time.

More childish name-calling trying to divert attention from being told
the truth.


The truth is you're dim :-)

______________

Malcolm Ogilvie aka Dr Thick is confused about his measure of
intelligence.

A Macmillan: "Do you think you don't have limited intelligence?"

Dr Thick: "What a contorted question. The answer is yes. What about
yourself

______________


I respond to responses and to those directly aimed at me.

And as you can't cope with such challenges, having made those claims
without having the requisite facts or knowledge to back them up, you
inevitably resort to childish name-calling and vain attempts to
denigrate me, and anyone else who has the temerity to point out where
you are wrong.

You really think that :-)

I know it.

Like you know everything else :-))

You just keep thinking that.



But what you fail to grasp is that my campaigning isn't aimed at this
ng so you have no effect on what I do. You're flattering yourself
again.

On the contrary. You spend an awful lot of time responding to me, asking
me questions about my qualifications, or my private life, or criticising
where I live.


Sure I do.

Yes, because you are desperate to denigrate me to try, vainly, to limit
the damage I am doing to your campaigns.

How many grey squirrels or deer have you saved since you started?

I'm not in a position to "save" animals but I am in a position to
counter those who kill them and undermine their activities.

And according to the responses I get I'm reasonably successful at
that.

No problems from my side.


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Hunting Goons
    ... find the going difficult you edge towards personal insult and abuse. ... I cut and paste to save time responding to your ... I accept your surrender, Angus, over your inability to defend yourself ... Saved me searching, Malcolm. ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: Group dead?
    ... When I get reasonable data or argumentation, ... The truth value of what I say doesn't depend on your willingness ... just as you choose to denigrate me. ... can make sense by the exercise of rational faculties. ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips)
  • We have always been and always will be hated!
    ... already hated us under Clinton, Carter, and all Presidents. ... as is the usual modus operandi when the truth hurts. ... and Venezuela will fall into line and embrace us under Obama is ... Again you can denigrate the author for speaking the ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Re: Fall of Saigon--Guess Who Was There?! (Re: The Bangladesh Myth)
    ... a post in order to play "gotcha," trying to denigrate the service ... of someone who did serve. ... who more honored free speech and truth? ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: What kind of woman would ......
    ... was a distortion of the truth. ... Do you not mean Malcolm? ... Apologies to both gentlemen for the error. ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)