Re: Here we go again!

On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:58:11 +0000 (GMT), Robert Seago
<rjseago@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <n7vup3t22javipo9okbptu2c8pqf3knfdq@xxxxxxx>,
<amacmil304@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Did you really post that stuff Angus or is someone impersonating you?

If you mean the exchanges with Malcolm Ogilvie, Of course I posted
them. It just shows how dim and ignorant the guy is - and he has a
habit of calling other ignorant

On the contrary I read them for once and they demonstrate your ignorance.

In what way?




I'm not out to "impress" people on this ng. They can take it or leave
it.

You will only impress a few other people who don't like conservation.

Conservation has little to do with what you and Malcolm support and
his dimness of mind when answering a simple question hadn't anything
to do with conservation.



I snipped, even if they agree with you ( as I do sometimes) they will
be embarassed for you.

Doesn't worry me in the slightest.
Clearly


Good. You've got that.



Surely only someone as dim as Malcolm Ogilvie could answer "yes" to
this question. Or would you by any chance?

______________

A Macmillan: "Do you think you don't have limited intelligence?"

Dr Thick: "What a contorted question. The answer is yes. What about
yourself?"

Do you think that tempting people with silly word games improves your case
Angus.


It's not silly word games at all. Malcolm Ogilvie, a PhD, was too
thick to understand the question.


By and large the things discussed here are predicated on knowledge rather
than intelligence

Not on either count in Malcolm's case.

and you demonstrate very regularly that you know little,

In what way?

and your repetition of the same flawed points demonstrates either your own
lack of intelligence or just plain destructive provocation.

What flawed points?

Come on Robert, spit them out.


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
.