Re: Hey Ogilvie

On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 07:37:50 +0000, Malcolm
<Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


In article <u4enp31bfd6nba3fh7i5h3fseqrt08da8j@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:16:14 +0000, Malcolm
<Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


In article <2d4mp39cidqslfrn44os4aedkeaefpedkv@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:16:10 +0000, Malcolm
<Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


In article <iukkp3detu5mtig6alnulnrdahoud98ako@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes

Well, Malcolm Ogilvie has certainly been asked by me enough times on
this ng about the subject of his thesis but never comes up with an
answer.

I'm flattered that you are sufficiently interested, Angus. That runs
rather counter to other comments you have made about me.

Don't be flattered, Malcolm.

But I am, Angus, whenever you take such a great interest in my
achievements.


Hardly groundbreaking. PhDs come ten a penny.

Which, if you believe that, makes it even more flattering that you
should take such an interest in mine.


Just taking the p**s , Malcolm and you're too dumb to see it :-))


I just love how defensive you become when anyone asks you about your
PhD Was your work pretty mediocre?

No, Angus, I'm not like you.


Well why be so shy and not tell everyone on this ng what it was about?

After all, you should be proud of your achievemenys:-)

The subject of my PhD is in the public domain and obviously I'm proud to
see it there.


Seems it took you at least six years to get your PhD from your first
degree.

And as far as I'm aware "Member of the Institute of Biology and
Chartered Biologist (MIBiol, CBiol)" is not a qualification but merely
membership of an organisation. So why do you list it as a
"qualification" in your biography? Are you just bullshitting the
public?




Is he hiding something?

Are you claiming that I am, and at the same time trying to libel me by
retaining the message subject in your reply, or are you just too lazy to
click your mouse button half a dozen times and discover the subject for
yourself?

Read what I wrote

I did. More importantly, I also noted that you didn't alter the subject
line of the message.

Good for you.

Yes, I'm observant.

No you're not; you're blinded by conceit and self importance.

Imagine having a "biography" on the Internet. It's just a joke.and
it's full of "has been" entries.

Now that's being observant:-)


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
.

Quantcast