Re: Unambiguous definition?
- From: Robert Seago <rjseago@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:52:59 +0000 (GMT)
In article <u8bap31d2epeari5g71e801i0h3sf3nri2@xxxxxxx>,
<amacmil304@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Anyone care to give an unambiguous definition of "native species"?
Conventionally, species native to the UK are regarded as those that have
arrived here since the last ice age without human assistance.
This is the generally accepted convention.
The rationale behind it, and the reason that I concur with it is that, the
heritage in Britain that we have is composed of species which have been
selected for our environment, that is our climates, soils and land use.
Many species which we love such as Rabbit, Brown Rat, Brown Hare, Fallow
deer etc. do not fall into this category, and few conservationists would
wish to eradicate these species, with the possible exception of the Brown
Rat in some cases.
--
Regards from Bob Seago: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/rjseago/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unambiguous definition?
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Unambiguous definition?
- References:
- Unambiguous definition?
- From: amacmil304
- Unambiguous definition?
- Prev by Date: Re: Hoorah I found pete (who?) what a character.
- Next by Date: Re: Unambiguous definition?
- Previous by thread: Re: Unambiguous definition?
- Next by thread: Re: Unambiguous definition?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|