Re: Essex wildlife trust are at it too!

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:08:19 -0800 (PST), "John M."
<john_howard_morgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Jan 17, 11:44 pm, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:37:36 -0800 (PST), "John M."



<john_howard_mor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 17, 11:23 pm, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 13:51:30 -0800 (PST), "John M."

<john_howard_mor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 17, 6:47 pm, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:

<snip>
There is no such ng that I can discover called alt.telephone.sex, but
you obviously know better - as always.

You brought it up so I presume you know all about it.

Well, you presumed wrongly, didn't you? Just like you presume wrongly
about everything to do with natural history and conservation.

So you made it up.

Nope. Just a senior moment during which the news group title I 'd
spotted in David L.'s "Profile" (aka Pete the Perve) was not correctly
stored in memory. Nice though, 'cos I was able to use this
recollection error to stuff one to you.


No you didn't. You just made yourself look a fool.


Did you make up all your scientific nonsense as
well?

You'll need to be more specific as there may be some old stuff that
has been superseded and therefore contains hypotheses no longer
supportable. That's how it works in science. There are no absolutes.
Doesn't mean it was made up, although it can look that way to 'hoi
polloi'





<snip>

If you wish to verify whether or not I am lying, search for the
profile of David L (aka too many names to list here) on "Google
Groups" Why do I think you won't bother doing that?

Not particularly interested if it's more of your trolling.

So if I tell you it's not trolling, will you go and look it up? Or
does the real Pete scare you a tad? You really ought to read some of
stuff he/she/it has posted to a shed load of dodgy sounding ngs.
Specially the pseudonyms he used at the time.

Who's Pete?



<snip>

I would NEVER give an addy out over Usenet, neither would I do so
privately without asking the address owner first

I don't mind giving out my address. Do you yours?

Not at all. But there are people who clearly do - Pete the Perve for
one.


Who's Pete?


Nice of you to step up to the plate for poor old keyboard warrior Pete
when he found himself compromised through his own multiplicity of
personae. But he's going to fancy you even more after the above
posting, you know.

You've a vivid imagination.

Pity it didn't improve your science.

If this means you are offering criticism of my recent paper, I suggest
you write a reasoned rebuttal and send it to the editor. That's the
way it's done.

What paper's that?

Do your own research. It's not difficult to find. I refuse to be a
self-publicist.

Andrex?

Your obssesion with things excremental is becoming clearer.

Answering your posts must be something to do with it.


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
.

Loading