Re: No room for tolerance in 17200 acres
- From: "John M." <john_howard_morgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:04:19 -0700
On Sep 25, 3:30 am, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:22:04 -0700, "John M."
<john_howard_mor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 24, 3:42 am, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 03:39:23 -0700, "John M."
But better not to plant trees where there were resident goats.
Why, exactly. Do you think it better to have goats rather than trees?
Or would it be a better idea to shoot the goats, as is done with deer
that browse on young trees?
Deer shouldn't be shot either. You consider yourself free to consume
whatever you want and in what quantity you feel like, yet you would
deny other species the same right to eat to survive under penalty of
death. Typical selfish attitude.
I would expect the deer (and the goats) to end up on a dinner plate
(or as carrion for necrophages), given that they cannot achieve the
destiny nature intended for them - to be eaten by wolves.
Not for 350 years. And since you seem to know about deer being the
prey of wolves, what percentage of the deer population was actually
caught?
Pretty much 100% of them. Wild animals seldom die from old age.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: No room for tolerance in 17200 acres
- From: amacmil304
- Re: No room for tolerance in 17200 acres
- References:
- No room for tolerance in 17200 acres
- From: amacmil304
- Re: No room for tolerance in 17200 acres
- From: amacmil304
- Re: No room for tolerance in 17200 acres
- From: John M.
- Re: No room for tolerance in 17200 acres
- From: amacmil304
- Re: No room for tolerance in 17200 acres
- From: John M.
- Re: No room for tolerance in 17200 acres
- From: amacmil304
- No room for tolerance in 17200 acres
- Prev by Date: Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- Next by Date: Re: No room for tolerance in 17200 acres
- Previous by thread: Re: No room for tolerance in 17200 acres
- Next by thread: Re: No room for tolerance in 17200 acres
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
