Re: Puffin chicks 'starving to death' CONservation hooligans get it wrong again!
- From: amacmil304@xxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:46:30 +0100
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 20:33:38 +0100, Malcolm
<Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <6gghb359aqf822fctnt5iip9la3h54idlh@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 18:12:40 +0100, MalcolmHave you seen a decline in Manx Shearwaters mentioned in the latest news
<Malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <vb7hb3h4kkms9mljdja5u4dv3k8t0roq8m@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:53:47 +0100, "BAC" <casswalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Wasn't it Canna where they killed all the brown rats because of the decline
in bird numbers?
See:
http://www.snh.org.uk/pdfs/publications/e_newsletters/teachdantirspring0
6/page02.pdf
Seems it was another massacre of wildlife costing tens of thousands
of pounds, all to no avail.
Killing rats doesn't bring back fish to the sea that have either been
overfished or have moved north through sea temperature changes.
Exactly! There was no need to kill them. Other factors seem to be
the cause of the decline.
releases?
Are you saying there's NOT a decline in Manx Shearwaters on Canna?
No, I thought not. Do try not to get confused about things
even if being confused fits your anti-conservation organisation agenda.
I think you're confused.
More rubbish from Angus
And if the shearwaters come back it definitely won't be "to no avail".
If they come back?
So after all the killing, you don't know if they'll come back?
You're a chancer, Malcolm, just like all the other SNH lackeys.
No Malcolm, you said "if they come back" so you don't know.
That's chancer speak.
and, of course, personal abuse and name calling.
Thank you for your abject surrender, Angus. I didn't think you'd last
long on this one, you were way out of your depth given your lack of
knowledge of either seabirds or their food.
Malcolm Ogilvie has a great problem with personal abuse; he can give
it but can't take it. He frequently abuses me by calling me a liar,
twister, ignorant, stupid etc., because I don't agree with his fake
conservation opinions but when he makes obvious blunders he can't cope
with personal criticism using similar abuse back at him. He seems to
particularly dislike the Dr Thick label.
He tries to claim that this amounts to my surrender, which is patently
not the case, but seems too dim to understand that by his own argument
he has often already surrendered himself. Such a claim shows a
befuddled mind that is incapable of logical thought and therefore
justifies the labels attached to him.
He has great difficulty in coping with reasoned argument and
mistakenly thinks that his opinions should go unquestioned and that
any other opinions are worthless.
This might be the result of a severe personality disorder that could
perhaps be described as smartarseology and is probably incurable.
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Puffin chicks 'starving to death' CONservation hooligans get it wrong again!
- Next by Date: Nice little earner
- Previous by thread: Re: Puffin chicks 'starving to death' CONservation hooligans get it wrong again!
- Next by thread: Nice little earner
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
