Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- From: "John M." <john_howard_morgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 03:49:25 -0700
On Jun 9, 12:19 am, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:27:27 +0100, Robert SeagoOh, really. So tell us what would happen to the millions of unsed
<rjse...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <2pgj639mcu5tmaohat9ang0co3jumik...@xxxxxxx>,
<amacmil...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
As I have told you many times, I am not a conservationist or an
environmentalist. But I oppose the dishonesty of those who say they
are but indulge in and encourage environmental damage
But you say you oppose the production of veal.
Of course I am.
But you are prepared to
eat dairy products
Milk production is not a product of the veal industry. And milk would
still be produced if veal was not.
calves under these circumstances.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- From: BAC
- Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- From: Jim Webster
- Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- References:
- Yet another "expert's" opinion
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- From: Robert Seago
- Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- From: amacmil304
- Yet another "expert's" opinion
- Prev by Date: Re: More serious news about introduced plants
- Next by Date: Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- Previous by thread: Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- Next by thread: Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- Index(es):