Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- From: malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 23:11:53 +0100
In message <4eefec3830rjseago@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Robert Seago <rjseago@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
In article <2pgj639mcu5tmaohat9ang0co3jumikkso@xxxxxxx>,Angus has never been one for letting accuracy get in the way of a good emotive propaganda statement :-(
<amacmil304@xxxxxxx> wrote:
As I have told you many times, I am not a conservationist or an
environmentalist. But I oppose the dishonesty of those who say they
are but indulge in and encourage environmental damage
But you say you oppose the production of veal. But you are prepared to
eat dairy products
>>
>Nonsense. You were taken to court for, among other things, misusing the
>word "slaughter".
<snip > But they're not really "reserves" they traps toThat is certainly not an accurate picture Angus.
lure birds to for shooting.
The fact he comments on things he hasn't a clue about doesn't help the accuracy of course.
--
Malcolm Kane
.
- References:
- Yet another "expert's" opinion
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- From: Robert Seago
- Yet another "expert's" opinion
- Prev by Date: Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- Next by Date: Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- Previous by thread: Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- Next by thread: Re: Yet another "expert's" opinion
- Index(es):