Re: Angus is ignored

In article <1180288682.925933.196180@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
John M. <john_howard_morgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Do you think that the calves could possibly be kept till they die
of old age?
No there is no way that can be done.
I oppose veal production, poultry factories, and foie gras production
but not conventional farming.

I am also with you here.

What you need to notice here, Robert, is that Angus uses milk in the
way that conservationists use modern facilities - like publications,
machinery, transport - because they don't see any viable alternative.
Yes, that is what I meant to convey. Angus could do his bit to cut down
the practices he disagrees with by abstaining from milk. So could I but I
am willing to compromise, because soya milk is disgusting.

I would however campaign for highest possible animal welfare standards.
So if conservationists are "fakes" because of this, then Angus and
other A/Rists are "fakes" also.
There is indeed a parallel here. How many times has Angus accused
conservationists of being fakes because of the compromise they make in
terms of for example of foreign travel?

--
Regards from Bob Seago: http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/rjseago/
.