Re: Sustainability Scam

On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:36:21 +0100, Andy Mabbett
<usenet200309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In message <752n13tbnefsprffh8rrctmle84n1oneb2@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes

You criticise from a fundamentally weak position. You refuse to practise
what you claim others should be doing.

No. I criticise them for being dishonest.

Then, since, you're a proven liar, you criticise from a fundamentally
weak position.

What make you think that?

You refuse to practise what you claim others should be
doing. Just as Malcolm said.

Not at all. I'm not a conservationist; they are hypocrits.

An example of fake conservation was the RSPB's news release of
February 2005 in which they said "cooking our planet will disrupt and
devastate all life and giving this process the cosy name global
warming only makes it easier for all of us, especially politicians, to
ignore the consequences", yet at the same time they were accepting
pages of world wide travel advertisements in their Birds magazine. Is
there any reason I should not call into question the honesty of these
people and call them fakes? That's exactly what they are!


Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
.