Re: Angus is confused
- From: amacmil304@xxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 08:26:45 +0100
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 23:09:42 +0100, malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
In message <toub13l84ub8rtse8ac32gj9d377a1dd26@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 23:22:48 +0100, malcolm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSnipped another 5 headers.
wrote:
Oh dear the poster insists on trying to impose his
Snipped 12 headers.
I am a loss to understand and explain.Readers please noteguide.You snip my messages at will, so you will
snipped yours at
will. The words left are yours and
For the benefit of those who seem to have an
good practice I have included a few
- Messages and articles should be brief
point. Don't
wander off-topic, don't ramble.
I feel this means don't repeat what you have
certainly reduce
posts as much as possible,
- If you include a signature keep it
of thumb
is no longer than 4 lines. Remember
people pay for
connectivity by the minute, and the
the more they pay.
Again this appears to urge the
seems to feel that 9 lines as a sig is
- If you are sending a reply to a
sure you
summarize the original at the
include just
enough text of the original to give a
Note include ***"Just enough of the
context"***
This will make
sure readers understand when they
Since NetNews, especially, is
distributing the
postings from one host to another, it
to see a
response to a message before
the
Giving context
helps everyone. But do not include
Note ***"But do not include the entire
HTH
Malcolm Ogilvie, aka know as Dr Thick on this
<Snipped a reply which
clearly showed that the poster had comprehend
Good for you MK.
Anyone reading this will realise good
Good for you MK
When you stop snipping so will I.
I degenerate into bad news group practice because
Because what? You've lost the place :-))
I have
I know, it's pretty obvious.
Readers will by now have noticed
That the poster is completely unable to carry on a
Don't make it worse for yourself. I've already pointed
I think it is a good idea I intend to continue.
Yes, you're that sort of fool :-))
I note he can't give any reason
I don't need to; it's obvious.
I'm sure they do
As a result I am not convinced
Not only are you not convenced about very much, you're not very
convincing about anything.
I am at a loss to understand
Nothing unusual. You've always had that problem.
It comes with my software.
Yes, soft in the head :-))
Perhaps if he reads some of my posts he will eventually
learn.
I learned all I need to.
You are at a loss to understand.
That's nothing new, Malcolm.
You've always had that problem.
will on others.
Not me. I don't care what you do. But if you snip my posts I shall
snip yours.
I am an optimist.
Optimism won't help you in your predicament.
I shall continue to try
Optimistic madness.
Fair enough.
:-))
Silly boy.
So why do you do it?
If you think it's silly you should stop and try to regain some
(definitely not all) of your sanity :-))
Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk
All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
.
- References:
- Re: Angus is confused
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Angus is confused
- From: malcolm
- Re: Angus is confused
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Angus is confused
- From: malcolm
- Re: Angus is confused
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Angus is confused
- From: malcolm
- Re: Angus is confused
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Angus is confused
- From: malcolm
- Re: Angus is confused
- From: amacmil304
- Re: Angus is confused
- From: malcolm
- Re: Angus is confused
- Prev by Date: Re: Superb example of conservation in action
- Next by Date: Re: Angus is confused
- Previous by thread: Re: Angus is confused
- Next by thread: Re: Angus is confused
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|