Re: Too thick to accept.
- From: "John M." <john_howard_morgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Feb 2007 09:17:43 -0800
On 23 Feb, 01:16, amacmil...@xxxxxxx wrote:
Dr Malcolm Ogilvie has a problem.
For months he has been snipping parts of my posts he doesn't agree
with and finds embarrassing. He refers to them as lies and distortions
- which they are not.
He says I have agreed that they are lies and distortions which is a
lie. .He is quoting me out of context in his usual twisted fashion.
Some time ago I decided I'd had enough and altered some of his
responses. I have never denied it. In fact, I usually mention it
within the same post
This brought howls of protest and claims of "forgery", which I find
quite amusing from one who is quite happy to alter my posts to suit
his agenda.
I have told him that if he stops altering my posts, I shall stop
altering his.
But he's too thick to accept.
Head-banger!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Too thick to accept.
- From: malcolm
- Re: Too thick to accept.
- References:
- Too thick to accept.
- From: amacmil304
- Too thick to accept.
- Prev by Date: Re: Is it a coincidence?
- Next by Date: Re: Too thick to accept.
- Previous by thread: Too thick to accept.
- Next by thread: Re: Too thick to accept.
- Index(es):