Re: Does the Woodland Trust care about capercaillie?

In message <obd1s212m3cc6vr57tgmbq73s09oa61hq9@xxxxxxx>, amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:30:23 +0000, Andy Mabbett
<usenet200309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In message <6jdvr2hbd23ilc13p67s0prvknbifo3qoc@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes

On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:17:55 +0000, Andy Mabbett
<usenet200309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In message <pk6vr212hh5i4dj5s8g1mmgrsbhvjc0fhs@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes

Do you make a habit of writing books about something you know about and
depend on others to help you?

Outside of fiction, autobiography and vanity, it would be a pretty
piss-poor author who didn't.

Anyone could tell him anything

Indeed - anyone could.

which would make the report about as
factual as most of the other tripe written by so-called
conservationists.

Once again you display your ignorance, Being an expert in such maters,
Malcolm would be sure to judge the reliability of his source, and know
when he needed to double check.

How would he do that ?

Angus surely as you claim to be able to do the job you don't need to ask that question or are you admitting you couldn't do the job.


--
Malcolm Kane
.