Re: Does the Woodland Trust care about capercaillie?

On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:30:23 +0000, Andy Mabbett
<usenet200309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In message <6jdvr2hbd23ilc13p67s0prvknbifo3qoc@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes

On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:17:55 +0000, Andy Mabbett
<usenet200309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In message <pk6vr212hh5i4dj5s8g1mmgrsbhvjc0fhs@xxxxxxx>,
amacmil304@xxxxxxx writes

Do you make a habit of writing books about something you know about and
depend on others to help you?

Outside of fiction, autobiography and vanity, it would be a pretty
piss-poor author who didn't.

Anyone could tell him anything

Indeed - anyone could.

which would make the report about as
factual as most of the other tripe written by so-called
conservationists.

Once again you display your ignorance, Being an expert in such maters,
Malcolm would be sure to judge the reliability of his source, and know
when he needed to double check.

How would he do that ?


Somehow, I doubt he'd take anything you told him at face value.


Nor me his or yours.


Once again, you presume to lecture and expert about a subject you appear
to know very little about.

Collecting data on the backs of others doesn't exactly qualify for
"expert" status.

Indeed not.

Good. You've got it.

Bu who said it did?

You did. :-))

That's just a straw-man- another of your
cheap attempts to avoid sensibly arguing the points at issue.

More like yours.


A bit like editing the DNA reports of others :-)

On the contrary.

Not at all.


Anyone could do it.

Once again you display your ignorance. Though you're welcome to prove me
wrong, by obtaining such an editorial position.


Wouldn't be interested. Let plebs like Malcolm do it if it makes them
feel important :-))

Even you, Andy.

Your resort, once again, to cheap abuse looks like yet another
surrender.

So you think that me saying you could edit DNA reports is an insult?

If you seem to think you couldn't, that's fine by me.




Angus Macmillan
www.roots-of-blood.org.uk
www.killhunting.org
www.con-servation.org.uk

All truth passes through three stages:
First, it is ridiculed;
Second, it is violently opposed; and
Third, it is accepted as self-evident.
-- Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
.